CMMC 2.0 Readiness & Gap Analysis

CMMC readiness starts with scope you can defend.

The fastest way to waste a CMMC budget is to remediate the wrong boundary. We start with contracts, FCI/CUI flows, systems, people, providers, and inheritance before turning requirements into remediation work.

Contracts & information obligations
FCI / CUI flows
Enclave, systems & users
External service providers & inherited controls
Scope before remediation

Security requirements travel with the contract and the information.

01

Contract

What requirements and information obligations actually enter the organization?

02

Information

Where do FCI and CUI originate, move, reside, and leave?

03

Boundary

Which systems, users, locations, and services are in the assessment scope?

04

Inheritance

What is provided by cloud, enclave, MSP, or other external providers?

05

Evidence

Can implementation be demonstrated to the level expected in formal assessment?

Evidence-readiness ladder

Implemented is not the same as assessable.

Readiness improves as the organization moves from intent to repeatable implementation to evidence that can survive assessor scrutiny.

01 Requirement understood and assigned
02 Control implemented in the scoped environment
03 Evidence consistently produced and retained
04 Owner can explain operation, exceptions, and dependencies
Blocker hierarchy

Fix the things that can invalidate the readiness story before polishing the package.

01 / SCOPE

The boundary is wrong or unsupported.

FCI/CUI flows, systems, users, providers, or enclave assumptions do not match operating reality.

02 / IMPLEMENTATION

The practice does not operate as claimed.

Technology, process, or ownership gaps prevent consistent implementation.

03 / EVIDENCE

The control may work, but cannot be demonstrated.

Records are missing, inconsistent, inaccessible, or disconnected from the scoped requirement.

04 / OWNERSHIP

No one can defend the operating model.

Responsibility, exceptions, provider dependencies, and recurring activities are unclear.

Questions before you buy

What buyers usually need clarified.

Do you perform the formal CMMC assessment?

No. Neon Clarity provides readiness and gap analysis. Formal assessment is performed by the appropriate authorized assessment organization.

Can you help define an enclave?

Yes. Boundary and enclave decisions are central to readiness when they fit the organization and information flows.

Do you review evidence, not just policies?

Yes. Readiness includes implementation and evidence because written intent alone does not establish assessment readiness.

How long does CMMC readiness take?

Timeline depends on scope, CUI and FCI flow complexity, and how much implementation and evidence work already exists. Most readiness engagements are scoped in weeks, not months.

What CMMC Level does this cover?

Scope is defined around your target Level and the contractual requirements driving it, established at the start of the engagement rather than assumed in advance.

A bounded engagement

Defend the boundary before you defend the controls.

Bring us the contract pressure, CUI/FCI flow, enclave plan, current SSP, or assessment timeline. We will start where CMMC readiness actually starts: scope.

You do not need to diagnose the exact engagement before contacting us. Bring the pressure, milestone, or decision.

Talk Through the AssessmentExplore All Assessments